Register/ Login   
Submit Mobile RSS Java Script Feed  
Home Videos Spotlight Movies Gallery Sports
Entertainment |  Business |  Politics |  Sports |  Health |  Education |  National |  Religion |  World |  Columnist |  Featured Stories |  Member's Stories


Published on 14-01-2008 In National
Viewed 5485 times | Written by N. Murugan IAS (Rtd)
A victory for Indian democracy
Everyone has agreed on one basic fact, regarding the Gujarat election results, that they are truly a personal triumph of Mr Narendra Modi. Many had predicted it even before the announcement of the poll process. The outcome surely wouldn't have surprised those who have been closely observing the politics in that state.

This electoral success has also lead to many healthy signs. It has proved that
[a] personal integrity of a leader can attract the unanimous endorsement of the masses even in these times, [b] anti-incumbency factor needn't work to eliminate a ruling party on all occasions, [c] internal bickering in a political party need not affect the election results [d] minority support alone is not enough to win an election and [d] any amount of attractive promises like free television sets or food grains will not fool the masses.

Further, it has also been proved that an electoral victory is possible without conducting political processions, seven miles long, without cut-outs and massive serial lightings.  This is a welcome development, because it throws some hope for the future success of honesty and integrity in public life in our democratic setup.


In the background of all these stand the sky high qualities of a single man, Narendra Modi.  What are those characteristics in him that made this possible?  They are:

The bachelor Chief minister, Modi lives in his house with three person; a cook and two peons.  His habit is to take his simple food all alone in his house.  If his cook is on leave one of the two peons cooks his simple food.  In his office he has two personal assistants – these are not IAS officers – who discharge the chief minister Modi.  They attend to his phone calls, particularly, to note who called and connecting them to the Chief Minister, if necessary, or noting down messages from them.  They also fix up his tour programs and personal appointments and attend to other routing items of work.  They do not have access to the residence of the Chief Minister.  

Gujarat is the first amongst the most industrialised States in India. Its speedy progress has been achieved during the tenure of Mr Modi. Under his rule, local and foreign investments have seen geometric progression in this state. In spite of this, none of those who opposed him in the recent polls could make a single accusation of graft – because there was none.

Companies seeking to start an industry in Gujarat would be granted appointments with Mr Modi after relevant applications have been processed through the concerned departments. Subsequent to a meeting with the CM in the presence of his bureaucrats, fast-track clearances are accorded in a routine manner.

Before the elections, a journalist posed a question to Mr. Modi: “What are the achievements of your government?”  To this Mr. Modi answers, “Instead of asking this question to me, wouldn't it be better if you asked the same thing to the common public, experts in political, economic and industrial fields?".

The correspondent queried professors in economics. Their replies brought forth three points enumerated below:


* Out of the 97 Memorandums of Understanding (MoU) signed between the government and industrial houses, 89 have already borne fruit.
* The remaining eight are in various stages of completion.
* Water and electricity are available in the rural areas without impediments.






Mr Modi never seeks personal praise.

When he was to be sworn-in in 2002, Modi's mother attended the function, but the CM simply ignored her. She watched the ceremony like the rest of the members of the common public, seated on a chair provided by someone who recognised her and placed in a corner. This incident is particularly relevant to be noted by those in a State [read Tamil Nadu] wherein the CM's near and dear occupies a special dais to "inspect" processions of the party-faithfuls.

Such things lead to the virtual absence of anti-incumbency factor.

Significantly, even in states like Tamil Nadu, it is true that anti-incumbency acts and those in power have been defeated, but it is because all those in power just indulge in corruption and irregularities.

Developmental plans' proper fructification and absence of freebies during electioneering are two other aspects of Modi's triumph. That the Congress lost despite promising free colour television sets during the run-up to the elections is worth remembering here.

Politicians in Tamil Nadu are of the firm belief that attempting to pander to the wishes of the highest denomination of the masses by announcing subsidies and indefinite procrastination in matters concerning unpopular decisions are a sure path to victory. On the contrary, despite bringing farmers who defaulted in electricity payments to book, Mr Modi won in Gujarat.

In several States, many in power believe that issuing election tickets to those who are corrupt because they represent a 'powerful' caste or two and thus ensuring victory. This has been proved ingenuine.

Upon Modi's personal intervention, 47 ruling party legislators were denied tickets for bad performance and complaints. These tickets were in turn distributed amongst more deserving candidates by the BJP. Of those 33 emerged triumphant.

In a word, antagonising seniors who were either corrupt or dullards and ignoring caste-based votes were welcome highlights of Modi's return to power – which may sound the death-knell to such practices.

And this was not all.

Newspapers, television channels, central ministers and self-side goals by a few bigwigs within his own party assailed Mr Modi simultaneously.

One can only hold Mr Modi who overcame all these impediments with aplomb in awe.

A few in the know aver that the real reasons for all this are that Mr Modi understood the ground reality and comprehended the mindset of his people.

Another important fact of these election results is that the people have understood the real import of terms like secularism and phrases like mollycoddling of minorities in the name of their security.

When asked during the elections as to what were his plans for the development of the minorities in Gujarat, Mr Modi replied, "My plans are for the development of the entire State in which minority and majority sections are included anyway."

Everyone concerned knows that the minorities are being looked after properly in all states by India.

Political observers have found that in the name of getting the endorsement of the minorities, when politicians pander to their whims and fancies, the majority would take a firm stand.

On that note alone, Mr Narendra Modi's victory is a victory for Indian democracy.
 
 16 Comments  Bookmark and Share   Share    Blog      Print
 

Add Your Comment

Join Indiainteracts for free to comment on this story. Have an account already? to comment
16 Comments

Dear Mr.Murugan,
I respect your view. But I want to just remind you even Hitler was not corrupt and he was a great patriot. He is not a womaniser nor a alcoholic. But he killed 6m Jews. So I think it is wrond to judge someone from a single point of view.

May be Gujaratis are inherently anti-Muslims as Tamils are anti-Brahmins, so they elected Modi inspite of his involvement in Gujarat riots. World has produced people like Modi. But we must be very cautious on these kinds of “Good Monsters” (although I do not agree he is Good)

Haren Pandya, his home minister was killed by him according to Pandya’s father. Modi has done things which Supreme Court and late Pres Narayanan condemned.

I am very sorry to hear from you “Mr Narendra Modi’s victory is a victory for Indian democracy.”. I think you are very much focussed on sorruption free Govt, which has hidden the atrocities done by Modi in Gujarat.

Although I do not have much experience like you, I beleive Modi victory is output of loophole in democracy, which is nothing but a number game. For e.g. Even some like Kamaraj can be defeated and someone like Syed Shabuddin can be elected.

Also I would like you to objectively analyse what Modi had done to Gujarat from all angles.
Regards
Suresh G

 
gsuresh - Comments as on 15-01-2008

gsuresh quote **************
I beleive Modi victory is output of loophole in democracy, which is nothing but a number game
gsuresh unquote***********

The number game is not a loophole in democracy. The number game IS democracy. Modi’s case may be extreme but we see similar cases in all other states including TN. After the murders of innocent people working in dinakaran, DMK alliance still won the bye-elections held in Madurai.

 
indian - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Gsuresh quote ******************
May be Gujaratis are inherently anti-Muslims as Tamils are anti-Brahmins
Gsuresh unquote ****************

I do not know when people are going to stop generalizing things even when making radical views such as these. Democracy has fooled people so much that they refuse to understand their own fallacies. What does “tamils are anti-brahmins” signify? Are all tamils anti-brahmins? Clearly not, considering some tamils themselves are brahmins. Even excluding tamil brahmins, are all tamils anti-brahmins? - Ofcourse not. So, even when making such statements as these we are looking at the numbers (again). So, are majority of tamils, excluding those who are brahmins, anti-brahmins? - even this is highly debatable. Maybe gsuresh wants them to be anti-brahmins just like the person he follows, but that is not and need not be true.

 
indian - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Dear SureshG,

I think you judge Mr.Modi only from one / two point of views. Don’t summarize your contemplation with one or two incident.

As you said Haren Pandya’s father is saying that Mr.Modi is the person who killed his son. I think he has accepted this as truth. Can you tell me the percentage of people believes in the same? Haren’s father wants to hang Mr.Modi but the Indian judiciary didn’t allow to hang a person on some one’s personal deem.

AS far as the 2002 riots are concerned, I think its all about action & reaction which we are facing from 1947; even in the past when Mr.Modi’s government was not ruling. When we are talking about Mr.Modi’s involvement in 2002 Godhra riot, I think it’s nothing but an out come of 2-3% persons mindset which is not supportive to prove Mr.Modi’s involvement. Above and beyond talking on Mr.Modi; I want to comment on your quote “Gujaratis are inherently anti-Muslims”. I think Gujaratis are not at all against any community (you must have learned the history about welcoming Parsis) but they have suffered lot because of this loving nature & now their tolerance level is reduced which I think obvious for any normal person.

You are asking Mr. N. Murugan to do objective analysis about Modi’s work done during his possession; I would like to bring few of them to your notice which was not done by any government in any state before:

1) ‘Gujarat is the only state in the country which has achieved a high growth rate of 10.7 percent during Mr.Modi’s tenure.
2) Gujarat has been rated as the best state in industrial investment and economic freedom. The efforts of his government have resulted into metamorphosis of a revenue-deficit state into a revenue-surplus state.
3) Agriculture production has almost quadrupled from Rs 9000 crore to Rs 34,000 crore, while the state leads in energy production with 1878 MW of power generation.
4) Rural economy was now vibrant owing to uninterrupted three-phase round-the-clock power supply to all 18,000 villages under Jyotigram project
5) Development packages like ‘’Vanbandhu Kalyan'’, ‘’Sagarkhedut'’, and ‘’Garib Samrudhi'’ schemes were under implementation for development of the deprived sections.

Except this his new resolution & the focus areas for the next five years would be to channelise youth power in the nation building, ushering education of international standards, removal of poverty, home for every homeless family, healthy and clean Gujarat, doubling the present installed capacity of power generation, women empowerment, achieving 12 per cent growth rate, and providing transparent and corruption-free governance.

Regards,
Hardik V

 
hardikvashi - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Dear Hardik,
My point is even a devil will come like an Angel. Hitler lifted Germany out of humiliation of 1st world war defeat. He improved Germany a lot. Stalin made USSR a super power.

We need to be cautious about such people. If progress is what we want at expense of other misdeeds, then it only reflects our own brutal nature.

I said Gujus are “may be” inherently anti-muslims.

Regards
Suresh G

 
gsuresh - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Well, stalin and hitler are not emerged in the democractic set up. Here, all free to work… free press, free judiciary, free NGOs, free secularist, free pseudosecularist, free mullah, free ALLOLYA, free adminstration set up…everyone worked against Narendra Bhai….even then he won. thats the point
Narendra Bhai slaped second time the media particularly delhi english media. For ALLoLYA people, Angel looks like an devil.

 
selvang - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Hi Selvang,
This is not just any other blog where you can talk in a stupid way. We are posting comments on a Mr.Murugan, a respected man’s view. So please refrain from using unneccessary verbal knitting.

Hitler become head after winning elections and then become a dictator. Read “Rise and Fall of Third Reoch” by William Shirer.

Regards
Suresh G

 
gsuresh - Comments as on 15-01-2008

This is infact an attempt by Mr. Murugan to absolve from the anti-modi stand taken by this website where this anti-BJP Girish Nikam was given free press to report from Gujarat all cooked up bull-shit in the name of secularism. This is really a welcome stand from him and should be commended for the same.

To add to the point, I also praise him for taking a dig at his party chief Sarath kumar for allowing his wife (Radhika) to flag off the new party.

Victory of Modi is really a victory of democracy as it is not just the congress he fought against. He fought against an unified opposition, the entire press, TV channels and an hostile election commission.

Modi did not bring any communal angle into the propaganda and contested the election on development plank which really makes him a bold man. Modi’s victory is really a slap on the face of the one-sided propaganda machinery containing the TV Channels, English Dailies and forums like India Interacts which were hell bent on defeating a good government.

It is only these people who wanted to keep the communal angle so that they can talk about something because they did not have anything else to comment on.

I commend you Mr. Murugan for doing this honest appraisal inspite of your tirade against him before the election.

regards
kumar

 
kumar - Comments as on 15-01-2008

Gsuresh: Just because you use the word “‘may be”, you are not entitled to say anything. In my opinion, you are very quick and wrong to generalize and do not care about offending a group or section of people. That makes you what - a racist? But can I say, “may be” all christians are racists?! That would be ridiculous.

 
indian - Comments as on 15-01-2008

The holocaust of Hitler had its root in anti semticism of Christianity over the ages since Christians believe that jews killed Jesus.
Hinduism on the other hand has no such hatred. It is inclusive, and most pluralistic religions. Islam has a history of blood curdling violence against Hindus. See:
Islam’s Other Victims: India. : www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=4649

IT is high time aggressive, violent, hateful semitic religions learn to respect Hindus and Hinduism. Hindus are no fools anymore. The more educated they are, the more aware they are and the internet is a good example of that.

 
venka2 - Comments as on 16-01-2008

 
hardikvashi - Comments as on 16-01-2008

I happened to attend the 38th Anniversary function of Thuglak this Monday where Mr Modi is a Chief Guest. Usually in Cho’s meeting, you could hear lot of applause from audience when Cho is addressing. But, this year, Modi has overtaken Cho. It was indeed nice speech from Gujarat CM mainly focusing on the development that he has done to his state. Major point highlighted in his speech are as follows.:

1. How Modi bought down the deaths during pregnancy / delivery.
2. How he bought down the attrition of students from schools from 49% to 3%. Now, Modi is aiming to bring it to 0% in 2010
3. The way in which he was able to give 24 hrs electricity all over Gujarat
4. How he achieved providing Narmada water (500 Kms of water pipe line completed in 700 days). Now he is planning to give 1400 Kms of pipe line in another 700 days)
5. Plans to bring Broadband connection to all villages in Gujarat. He said that an efficient Maths teacher from Chennai can teach students in rural village in Gujarat.
6. Way he chooses the village: Modi said that he will travel to village which is poor in education during peak summer and he will by himself take initiative to bring up the village (especially in education)
7. He doesn’t believe in distributing anything for “free”. He said that he has disconnected electricity to the farmers who were defaulting their electricity bills and still won the election
8. When Congress came with free color television, Modi (on the same day) said that he will server notices to those who haven’t paid their taxes
9. When he assumed power, the state was in deficit. But, now it has excess crores. That too, without any increase in taxation
10. He said that the same laws, same tax, same persons and Govt organizations were working before and now. The difference is there is no corruption in his tenure
11. It takes around 7 years for a developed country to get back from major natural calamities like earthquake. But, it took only 3 years for Gujarat (mainly Kutch region) to return to normalcy.
12. For example he said there is a Toll Gate between Gujarat and Maharashtra at their border. Annually, almost same number of vehicles pass to and fro to Gujarat and Maharashtra. Toll Charges are same for both states. But, the revenue from Toll Gate of Maharashtra is Rs 2.5 crore less than that of Gujarat. “Where has this money gone” is the question from Modi
13. Good point that I liked from Modi is that he said that people in power should not target next election. Instead they should target winning people’s heart.
14. Another good point is that he said that he did not enjoy power, where as he took it as his responsibility.
15. He has not taken vacation from the day he became CM for first time
16. Last but not the least, he said that he is big fan of Cho and praised that Cho is a person who writes by his conviction. Modi said that Cho has many friends in BJP, but never hesitates to criticize them and BJP, if they do any mistake.

Mr Cho said that the difference between Modi’s speech and other leader’s speech is that other leaders only say what they will do, where as Modi has said what he has done.

 
anandvg - Comments as on 16-01-2008

i think the media in general and the english print and television took lessons from goebbels, nazis and fascists to vitiate the election atmosphere in gujarat and expected the people to be misled. sri. murugan has only tried to state that voters in gujarat have recorded their opinion on the various issues faced by them post ‘godhra’. it is unfortunate that the media and especially the english language are unable to read the writing on the wall. instead of trying to draw the correct lesson they are harping on the rejected (by the people of gujarat in a peaceful democratic election) views and calling ‘modi’ names. now i understand who is a fascist and who is a democrat. the unbriddled condemnation in the media - press and video- of modi helped him reap a lot of votes necessary for his historic victory. thank god and the people of guajarat for the success democracy has achieved in gujarat. more than modi it is the media and fascist leadership in the congress and communists who have to be thanked for the defeat of UnPrincipledAlliance (UPA). n.srinivasan

 
nsrinivasan - Comments as on 16-01-2008

gsuresh
Anything, you understood wrongly. Hitler never be allowed anybody who against him. During his period, German devlopment is on the defense side. Of course, at that time, any country developing index is based on power. you forget that why Jews killed?. Go to history…what we are worrying now exactly this?…..so proof already evidence from his history….Come to stalin…..his ideology is far far from democracy…….soviet devlopment is like as a paper tiger…..the result is collopse of soviet on around 1985…….
Everybody, talking about Narendra modi won………..but forgetting one thing…….he may possible to loose next election though he perform well…………that is not the point here…… He is the person shown a courage stood up against the anglo media……..anglo media always think that they are powerful……in his case, media is just one entity……nothing to stop……NOW, EVERY POLITICAN TAKEN THIS MESSAGE………

 
selvang - Comments as on 16-01-2008

Oh my dear Suresh, How did I miss your “usual” stupid comments here. And you act as if you are noble here. You condemn Hitler for killing the Jews. I know how much you worship him for doing this, from inside. And like as usual, when all other bombarded, you have gone into hiding.

And I can understand your “Belly-fire” (vayatherichal) about Modi as he is totally in your way of evangelising Gujarat. So no matter what you blabber, he is great!! And he is Great by all Yardsticks.

Actually you and all those who support your elk Karunanidhi and his elks, should hang out of shame, just for one word that Modi uttered. He said, that his people rejecting the freebies offered by that evangelist Sonia to capture the power is the best form of democracy. That itself is a proof that they are the hard-workers unlike more than half of TN who are really lazy bums, who voted MK to power based on his freebies. And the irony is that the same people who wanted everything free, celebrate “uzhavar thirunal” and “labour day”, which are clear epitome of hard works.

So I can see that, it is nothing but your “Belly-fire” which is making you to say this.

Regards,
Venkatesh

 
tvvenkatesh - Comments as on 17-01-2008

 
vikramkhatana - Comments as on 30-11-2008

Celina, Monica Bedi walks the ramp

Triumph International unveils Spring Summer Collection

Featured Stories

  • MIDS, a national social science research ...
    Professor P. Radhakrishnan ,2010-02-03
  • Bofors: the stain that won't go away
    Amulya Ganguli ,2009-10-14
  • Why Pakistan is obsessed with Kashmir
    Amulya Ganguli ,2009-08-21
  • Drought can be overcome, action must be ...
    Sushma Ramachandran ,2009-08-21
  • Jaswant episode demonstrates BJP's lack ...
    Mayank Chhaya ,2009-08-21

    More

    56th National Film Awards








  • About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ | Sitemap